- Growth & Innovation, Technology
Deposits, withdrawals: Five strategies to reconfigure branches, free up capital and fund growth
Guenther Hartfeil
Share
Almost all banks have grown by acquisition, resulting in a mix of facilities. Many older branches are oversized and single purpose in nature: former bank headquarters or large branches built for when the industry needed many more teller stations, drive-up lanes and deposit operations space than today.
So it’s no surprise that on the cusp of 2017, we have far more invested in facilities than needed—and in an ideal world, we would reduce branch configuration and cost. This would make banks more efficient and free up capital to invest in new channels that better meet changing customer needs.
The question is not whether this should be done. It’s how. As one bank CEO told us, “I know we have facilities that aren’t suited to our needs, but given the capital investment I can’t afford to do anything about it.”
But we need to do something about it.
New channel creation shows no sign of slowing down: It takes time and money to internally develop or purchase. Given the expense of regulatory burdens and other financial pressures, how can banks fund new services, delivery channels and technology?
Downsizing a branch via a sale-leaseback can provide unique benefits. Besides any immediate capital gain, expenses shrink due to reduced square footage. This also lessens costs for facilities upgrades or technology implementation. Additionally, a bank will often not have to pay for the construction and development costs of a downsizing—in fact, downsizing can be a provision of the sale-leaseback, meaning the new landlord pays for demolition, construction, and build-out to resize the space.
If a bank has the time, resources and desire to retain branch ownership, leasing a portion of an underused branch or the entirety of an unused one can generate income. As a landlord, the bank may be required to update, upgrade or renovate new tenant space. This arrangement also requires resources for continued tenant maintenance, and monitoring potential co-tenancy and ongoing regulatory issues.
If the branch is leased, the option to downsize may still exist. In many cases landlords will renegotiate—especially if the branch occupies a desirable location—or the request can be packaged with other location options. Alternatively, the bank could downsize on its own and sublease the unused space: a worthwhile option for banks with adequate resources or real estate experience. But it could also invite the stress of hosting a less-than-stellar tenant. Partnering with a company that offers design-build services may be a better solution. A bank should also check its lease and talk with its landlord as to whether vacating or building out the space and then sub-leasing the vacancy are allowed.
Regardless of how far along your bank is in implementing—or not implementing—a distribution analysis and restructuring plan, move now. Physical facilities, while important, do not have the same value to customers as in the past. Furthermore, there’s greater need than ever to fund new channels and technology. Banks that lag in these areas will only face greater challenges to remain competitive. Then, branch closings could become far less a matter of choice.
Guenther Hartfeil is a consultant at Austin, Texas- based Peak Performance Consulting Group, which specializes in banking strategy and distribution. He can be reached at [email protected].
Gianna Whitver is an associate at Brookline Branch Services, a firm that helps banks optimize and downsize branch real estate. She can be reached at [email protected].
Join our community to unlock exclusive content, connect with industry experts, and gain access to valuable resources that will help you stay ahead.