- Growth & Innovation
Your 2020 budget: Budging to maximize results
David Kerstein
Share
Believe it: We’re already starting to think about 2020 budgets. Perhaps you are, too. But it’s also that time of the year when we tighten up for the fourth quarter, so we can assume the strongest position going into the new year—and begin to pin down those new year’s numbers.
This process always eats up time but to what end? For all the effort, survey after survey reveals that more than half of executives believe their company’s approach could and should improve.
Most indicate their plans accurately describe the current situation and challenges: a traditional “SWOT” (situation, weakness, opportunity, and threat) analysis. But the common complaint almost always centers on the time overspent on “where we are now.” Compare the short shrift on efforts to prioritize and operationalize critical strategic initiatives that really drive the business forward.
We must get the balance right. Compared to the past, the speed of change has accelerated to the point where time, far from a luxury, is now a scarcity soon be measured in days as opposed to quarters.
With increased competition from bigger, deeper pocketed competitors defining the competitive framework, the time has come to reevaluate our market positioning. Consumers and small businesses are also changing how they use financial services, leading us to rethink our distribution channels. Technology innovation and sophisticated data management? That’s moving forward at warp speed, causing us to assess investments and skills we need to stay relevant, and attract a younger demographic.
Our point of view: Typical planning models successfully define paths to achieve short-term goals but fall short in helping management to make needed changes that address our industry’s rapid evolution. Granted, we need to nail both: to create success now while aggressively changing to position us for even greater future success. But planning and budget models require a fresh approach.
Traditional planning moves in increments—starting from the current situation as it aims to achieve modestly achievable improvements. The pathway to success can easily be mapped; for example, “10 percent improvement year over year.” We propose an alternative: aspiration-based planning that springboards from a vision of the future we want to achieve and then unpacks it into specific, time-based actions.
Here, we don’t mean high-sounding mission statements such as “provide superior return for our stakeholders,” “be the financial institution of choice” or “provide superior customer service.” What does that mean? Better return on assets than industry average? Top quartile peer performance? Highest regional JD Power customer satisfaction score? Best bank for millennials or small businesses?
Stepping back, how do we get where we want to go? Our model starts with a timeline that transcends the typical planning cycle, so we can break free from perceived budgetary, personnel or technology constraints. While real, these constraints often concern perceived limitations rather than insurmountable roadblocks.
Getting there won’t be easy; even the best banks may fall short on one or more of these strategies. But in an age of rarified time we still have some weeks to adjust—bearing in mind, of course, that our best 2020 budgets require 20-20 vision.
Want more Banking Strategies? Sign up for our free newsletter!
David Kerstein is President of Austin, Texas-based Peak Performance Consulting Group, which specializes in helping community and regional banks grow. He can be reached at [email protected].
Become a member to unlock exclusive content, connect with industry experts, and gain access to valuable resources. If your employer is an institutional member, activate your ProSight membership benefits with a simple email address.